Stroke Mortality Among Alaska Native People :: Article Review, Ronnie Horner

My denomination review is on, Stroke Mortality Among Alaska Native citizenry, by Ronnie Horner. The Alaskan Natives have been suffering with the vast number of death rate rates caused by strokes. This article was written to successfully understand the Alaskans stroke problem or factors that contribute to this problem, and eventually find strategies that will aid in its barroom. The only problem that exists with trying to come up with strategies for prevention is the sparseness of the epidemiological info of the Alaskan Natives. It is hard to categorize the Alaskans in unrivaled separate group, the Horner states, to its failure to consider Alaska Native People as one distinct cultural group, one among the many that comprise the American Indian/Alaska Native designation(Horner 1). This creates a problem because it puts limitations on the efficiency of the epidemiology of the Alaskan Natives. With this universe said, patterns have arisen in the number of stroke victims that are A laskan Natives, Stroke Mortality appears to be significantly elevated among relatively younger American Indians/Alaska Natives compared to US whites of similar age (Horner 1). This shows that there must be an unknown factor that has led or caused the younger Natives to have a stroke. Something must had to change because the reciprocation elevated is used which indicates recently increased to what it normally was. It seems that Alaskan Natives are the number one ethnic group that is impacted by Stroke Mortality, Horner points out, Of note, data for the 1990s indicate that stroke mortality has decreased in all racial ethnic groups except for American Indians/ Alaskan Natives(Horner 1). In detail this article attempts to figure out what factors are causing these elevations in stroke mortality that is not seen in any other ethnic group. Methods/Results/Conclusion The doctors had to first roll up the death certificate data of the Alaskan Natives, Horner states, We conducted an analysis of death certificate data for the state of Alaska for the period 1984 to 2003, comparing age standardized stroke mortality rates among Alaska Natives residing in Alaska vs. US whites by age category, genders, stroke type, and time (Horner 1). This will allow the doctors to examine the data to really conclude that Alaskan Natives were more(prenominal) prone to strokes than whites. With this data the doctors also need a population of Alaskans that they could carefully examine and study, Horner explains, the study population was defined as all Alaskan residents who self-identified as Alaskan Native People.

Essay --

There were many reasons behind the f solely of the Roman Empire, however, the economic reasons were the main source of its collapse. The fourth century was the layover of time where the economy started to experience problems. During this time period, there were many inequalities between the wealthy and the poor, decreasing population, the German Barbarians holding capital of Italy for ransom, cutting off their address networks, inflation, and finally the de-specialization of the economy. Each of these causes were very significant in leading up to the fall of the Roman Empire. Throughout history, in many civilizations, there has always been a gap between the rich and the poor, and the gap between these groups in the Roman Empire was no exception either. The difference between the rich and the poor importantly impacted the status of the economy. For example, in the Roman Empire, the rich could get away with almost everything. They could do it by two methods, they could pay th eir taxes in small portions so they wouldnt have to pay them all at once, or they could also simply avoid them by bribing the government, as opposed to the poor which had to pay them all at once. (Hayward, 1958, p. 105) If they did not follow this procedure, they would be punished one way or another. Since the rich were of high status, they could be heard by the government easily, with no possible penalties while the poor were given consequences if they did the same. The gap between the rich also grew wider and wider due to wealthy landowners driving tenant farmers out of their lands and treating those lands as their own. The rich were very important in the status of the economy as well. They could impair the authority of the central government. (Haywood, 1958, p. 104-105... ...etc. Trade was dependent on the status of the government in the Roman Empire. Since the Roman government was really powerful, it restricted some aspects of trade. Along with this, maritime trade was decreas ing drastically. There were attacks on ships on the Mediterranean sea, which decrease trade between Rome and other countries. Transport affected the geographic division of labor in the Roman Empire. (Paolilli, 2008, p. 282) The Roman Empire used to be a prosperous place to live in until it started to experience many problems which led its decline. The status of the economy was affected by many reasons including economic diversity between the wealthy and the lower class, inflation, the ransom of Rome with the Germanic Barbarians and finally, the de-specialization of the economy. Romes foolish actions along with some outside influence led Rome to its demise.